Unfulfillable Promise: Mediation Efforts in the Russian-Ukrainian War Since 2014
December 05, 2023
Tetyana Malyarenko and Stefan Wolff
This is a summary of an article originally published by PONARS Eurasia under the title "Unfulfillable Promise: Mediation Efforts in the Russian-Ukrainian War Since 2014."
The authors write:
- Although there is now a recognition that the conflict in and around Ukraine involves many actors at different levels, this was insufficiently reflected in the mediation efforts between 2014 and 2022, which ultimately failed to prevent the escalation from hybrid to conventional war. This is not to suggest that mediation, in whatever format, could have accomplished this, but it is to caution against (albeit without dismissing) a fatalistic view that, with the benefit—and bias—of hindsight, now constructs a narrative that condemns mediation efforts as having enabled Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Rather, the point is that understanding why mediation at the gray-zone stage of the war was insufficiently effective may help to prevent a similar failure in the future if and when the current conventional war “slips back” into a hybrid disguise. Three points stand out in this context.
- First, the principal political framework of mediation—the Normandy format—focused too narrowly on just one aspect of the complex blended conflict in and around Ukraine.
- Second, while this pretense may have been helpful in keeping Russia engaged and thus in facilitating the relative, albeit temporary, successes of OSCE mediation in the Trilateral Contact Group, it meant that mediation failed to address two other, closely connected dimensions of the broader conflict, namely between Russia and Ukraine and between Russia and the West.
- Third, when it became evident that the Minsk agreements were unimplementable—Ukraine having been forced to sign on to arrangements that unfairly favored Russia and denied democratic forces any meaningful voice—Ukraine ’s partners not only stopped supporting their implementation outside the Normandy and TCG formats, but also failed to propose alternative formats through which a more adoptable and functional agreement could have been mediated.
Read the full article on PONARS Eurasia website.
Author
Tetyana Malyarenko
Tetyana Malyarenko is Professor of International Security and Jean Monnet Professor of European Security at the National University Odessa Law Academy and a Philip Schwartz Fellow at the University of Regensburg.
Author
Stefan Wolff
Stefan Wolff is Professor of International Security and head of the Political Science and International Studies Department at the University of Birmingham.
The opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author. Photo by the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine shared under a public licence.
Stay up to date!
Never miss a Russia Matters exclusive! By signing up for our media advisory, you'll be notified when new exclusives are published.
Sign up here!
Recent Analysis
Is Russia Shifting Toward Mobilization Economy or Forming New, Loyal Business Elite?
May 30, 2024
Andrei Yakovlev
CIA Director Burns on Ukraine: ‘We’re Running Out of Time to Help Them’
April 25, 2024
George W. Bush Presidential Center
Personnel Stagnation to Splinter Putin Elite With Battle of Lost Generations
April 19, 2024
Andrey Pertsev